Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Teachers often use assessment instruments in their classrooms from various sources, including teacher-made tests, with unknown psychometric properties. While an individual teacher may use such assessments in a pre/post design to measure student learning gains, reflect on teaching, and evaluate the quality of an instructional unit, it is uncertain whether these data could be used to inform program improvement or evaluation across classrooms or across schools. The present study uses a multilevel Monte Carlo simulation study to evaluate the use of unit pre/post assessment data aggregated across classroom assessments with varying difficulty and reliability to measure the effect of this design on Type I error, observed power, and bias. Findings suggest that aggregated classroom assessments are a viable data set.
Matthew Ryan Lavery, South Carolina Education Oversight Committee
Joyce Watson Nutta, University of Central Florida
Alison Youngblood, Western Kentucky University