Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Committed to biography conceived as a complex multi-faceted researching endeavor, I theoretically embrace the insight that any biography is as much about the biographer as it is about the “subject” (Alpern, et. al., 1992; Backscheider, 2001; Behar, 1993; Stanley, 1992, 2013). Such a stance invariably compels a biographer’s self-reflexive practices that aim for what Pillow (2003) urges as “reflexivities of discomfort.” These involve “practices of confounding disruptions…” (p. 192) that keep the critical intent of reflexivity in play. But Pillow (2015) too recognized limitations “of a reliance upon a modernist distinction between the ‘self/selves’ in reflection and self/reflexivity” (p. 3). She thus expanded her interrogations of reflexivity, in part to propose potentialities of examining what may be opened up “by putting fissures of irreducible differences alongside each other” (2015, p. 12).