Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In recent years, United States policy-makers and legislators have increasingly interested in tying teacher performance with student outcomes. In some states, high-stakes teacher personnel decisions are often made based on the estimated value-added to student achievements by teachers’ input. Researchers are concerned about the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers, especially the inconsistency of teacher effectiveness report under different teacher evaluation models.The purpose of the present paper is to investigate if different methodological models (simple student growth model, covairate adjustment value-added model, mixed-effects value added model, student growth percentile model, and propensity score matching) will produce different teacher effectiveness results using a multi-years longitudinal data set of annual student achievement test scores.