Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study was thus to investigate how different priorities for language instruction, such as teaching dominant conventions and teaching linguistic flexibility, are realized in responding to student writing. I used qualitative content analysis to systematically describe responses to linguistic features on student papers from three writing instructors. I conducted an interview with each participant to serve as a preliminary dataset. Results demonstrated that instructor comments emphasized correcting linguistic features consistent with standard language ideologies and that participant interviews and shared course objectives presented linguistic features as more variable than did comments. These results suggest the need to incorporate specific models of commenting strategies into existing sociolinguistic variationist models of writing at the curricular and instructional level.