Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Conceptualization and reasoning are critical aspects of mathematical thinking and yet there has been little written about the ways in which teachers conceptualize and reason about draggable objects in a dynamic geometry environment. In this paper we investigated such conceptualization and reasoning from two perspectives: continuous variation and a set of examples. We found that conceptualization and reasoning were mostly associated with generating examples. This finding raises concerns about conceptualization of and reasoning about draggable objects as being mainly associated with one perspective that is more static in nature than dynamic. We also found that continuous variation was mainly characterized by descriptions of an object: having invariant properties under continuous movement; having different instantiations/formations; and containing strong links to generalization.
Gal Gili Nagar, Yeshiva University High Schools
Chandra H. Orrill, University of Massachusetts - Dartmouth
Stephen J. Hegedus, Southern Connecticut State University