Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study fills a critical gap in the extant literature by comparing workforce-, classroom-, and program-level predictors of quality in programs serving infants and toddlers paid for with subsidies with programs that receive other sources of public and non-public funding. Using the most recent nationally representative data available, the NSECE (n=1,091), our findings suggest that while programs serving children receiving subsidies tend to offer fewer programmatic supports to families and staff and are staffed with less qualified teachers, particularly as it compares with Early Head Start programs, they typically have smaller group sizes, potentially allowing for more meaningful teacher-child interaction. We discuss specific items that could be targeted for increased funding to increase infant and toddler classroom quality.