Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In this study, we further explore the negative relationship between clout and cognitive processing first reported by Author (2019). Our variable of interest, clout, is a summary variable calculated by the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) tool and is used to understand the level of confidence in writing (Abe, 2020; Jordan, Sterling, Pennebaker, & Boyd, 2019). A series of linear mixed models were fitted to evaluate, after controlling for gender, degree, and type of post, if the focal relationship between each sub-score of cognitive processing (insight, causation, discrepancy, differentiation, certainty, and tentativeness) and clout changed across courses with different pacing (self-paced or instructor-paced). We found that insight, discrepancy, certainty and differentiation were negatively associated with clout scores.