Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Secondary school experiences of creativity encouragement and discouragement were explored with a constructivist grounded theory methodology. 369 students communicated their significant creativity experiences through an online questionnaire; 14 students participated in in-depth, iterative interviews. The students in my study experienced encouragement of their creativity with three key conditions: freedom, meaningful challenge, and teacher belief. The parallel opposite conditions—constraint, lack of meaningful challenge, and lack of teacher belief—discouraged creativity in this context. This grounded theory not only enriches understanding of the conditions required to support youth in their creativity in education contexts, but also contributes understanding of the nature and influence of creativity discouragement. In addition, the study highlights the all-too rare student voice in the creativity conversation.