Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This systematic review examined scientific evidence of the utility of learning progression-based assessments and practices to inform teaching and student learning in classroom contexts. LP-based assessments were theorized as boundary objects. Fifty-three studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed against five research questions. Evidence highlighted their potential for supporting teacher judgements, maintaining focus on key aspects of learning, informing instructional decisions, and improving teacher learning and development. While 21 studies measured student achievement, reporting positive overall effects, only six adopted the experimental designs needed to make causal claims. Teacher professional development appears necessary to support implementation, with ongoing challenges related to alignment, the imperfect nature of progressions, and inconsistent student responding and reasoning.