Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Utility-value interventions have proven effective in helping students find relevance in their math learning. Still, students sometimes have difficulty connecting to examples of math use. In this qualitative, exploratory study, we investigated students’ responses to an intervention prompting them to think about how they use math in various contexts (i.e., outside of school, in other classes, in the future). We used an inductive code-mapping process to organize their responses by how they identified their math use. Then, we conducted a thematic analysis looking across themes and prompts, finding that some prompts resulted in greater variety, specificity, and types of math described. These findings provide insights into how students think about using math, with implications for the design of future interventions.