Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study analyzes discourses of writing in the ELA Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and teacher interviews. Drawing on Hardt & Negri’s (2000) notion of Empire, I explore how representations of oppressive structures might emerge in writing discourses. Data sources include seven interviews from 4th, 5th, and 6th grade teachers, and the Standards. My ongoing analysis draws on critical discourse (Fairclough, 2003) and open, iterative coding methods (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). Initial findings show that discourses in both the Standards and teacher interviews prioritize purposes for writing as participating in academic or professional institutions, potentially reproducing structures of Empire. Some teachers also presented discourses of self-expression and change-making as purposes for writing, but found school settings limiting.