Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Social justice educators aim to cultivate both students’ abilities to think “critically” in the sense of thinking for themselves, and to think “critically” in the sense of arriving at particular, anti-oppressive conclusions. However, these two ideals often come into contradiction, as students’ self-directed thinking doesn’t always lead to anti-oppressive conclusions. This ethnographic study elucidates how students responded to teachers’ attempts to actualize both goals in an undergraduate teacher education course. Findings demonstrate how efforts to foster both ideals made the realization of each more difficult. These findings elucidate contradictions in the use of progressive pedagogies to teach social justice, and argue that an explicit explication of power may better facilitate teachers’ social justice objectives.