Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In Sweden, along with the changing governing model in terms of centralization, decentralization, marketization and privatization of education, as well as the performative turn in education (Lindblad, 2018), the overarching values of the Nordic model such as social justice, equality, equal opportunities, integration, and democratic participation for all students irrespective of social and cultural background and abilities (Imsen, Blossing, & Moos, 2017; Lundahl, 2016) have been challenged. These challenges have also affected the relationship between home and school, and parents' position in education. The presentation aims to describe, analyze and discuss how the Swedish parents’ position in education has constructed and reconstructed in educational policy and practices over time. This presentation addresses parents' position regarding (a) how their role and responsibilities in education have been defined and argued for in the policy documents; (b) what their real position in education has been.
The analysis is based on a review of selected central educational policy documents such as School Laws, government official report series (e.g. SOU), and national curricula from various periods, and relevant research literature in the Swedish education context (e.g. Bergnehr, 2015; Dahlstedt, 2009; Erikson, 2004; Gu, 2017; Kristoffersson, 2008; Smith, Helgertz & Scott, 2016). The preliminary analysis reveals that the rationales behind the policies are linked to the various phases of Swedish educational reforms. Since the decentralization, marketization and privatization reforms, more demands have been placed on parents’ own responsibility for and ability of engaging themselves in education. Ideas about parents’ involvement have shifted focus more to parents’ support role in children’s learning outcomes and academic performance in relation to the curriculum goals. Gaps exist between the rhetoric of school-home partnership and collaboration and the reality of parental involvement. The issues of segregation between different parent groups and the exclusion of parents due to their different socio-economic and cultural/linguistic conditions have increased.
Bergnehr, D. (2015). Advancing home–school relations through parent support? Ethnography and Education, 10(2), 170-184.
Dahlstedt, M. (2009). Parental governmentality: involving ‘immigrant parents’ in Swedish
schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 193-205.
Erikson, L. (2004). Föräldrar och skolan. Doktorsavhandling. Örebro universitet.
Gu, L. (2017). Using school websites for home - School communication and parental
involvement? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2), 133–143.
Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (2017). Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 568–583.
Kristatoffersson, M. 2008. Lokala styrelser med föräldramajoritet i grundskolan. Doktorsavhandling. Umeå universitet.
Lindblad, S. (2018). Education governance by results? On communication in a performative turn in Swedish education. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reforms in an era of transnational governance (Educational Governance Research Vol. 7, pp. 63–76). Springer, Cham.
Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(1), 3–12.
Smith, C.D., Helgertz, J., & Scott, K. (2016). Parents’ years in Sweden and children’s educational performance. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 5(6), 1-17.