Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Creativity assessments mostly involve human raters for scoring student creativity products. The examination of rater performance in the scoring process is critically important for the reliability, validity, and fairness of the scores. This study evaluates a creativity assessment in science based on the conceptual framework of rater-mediated assessments. Twenty-four sixth graders consisting of gifted and non-gifted students completed two science tasks that are scored by three groups of raters with different levels of expertise. A many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) is used for the data analysis. Major findings include (a) non-gifted students showed higher creative ability than gifted students in these two science tasks and (b) raters with different levels of expertise had comparable scoring performance in creativity assessments.