Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
States have increasingly adopted weighted student funding formulas, increasing subsidies to schools for students deemed to have costlier educational needs. A recent reform in California substantially increased the compensatory subsidy most charter schools could expect for the low-income students they enroll. This could have affected the incentives of charter schools, potentially ameliorating concerns that they will “cream skim” students from traditional public schools. Difference-in-difference and triple-difference analyses indicate that these larger funding weights increased the rate at which charter schools enrolled low-income students. This effect was concentrated among charter schools initially enrolling low-income students at relatively low rates, suggesting that “cream skimming” behavior varies across charter schools and can be mitigated by appropriately weighted school funding systems.