Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Prevalence studies have been conducted to assess adoption and use of mixed methods research (MMR) in different contexts. A limitation of these studies is their dichotomous conceptualization of MMR adoption (adopted or not) as opposed to viewing adoption as a continuum. This study provides a proof of concept to determine whether the construct of adoption of MMR can be measured using researchers’ reporting practices of MMR elements. The results showed that it is a construct in which some MMR elements (i.e., Integration techniques, Sequence, and Qualitative and Quantitative Methods) had the ability to distinguish doctoral dissertation abstracts. This work contributes to the field of MMR with a new conceptualization of adoption of MMR and provides critical reflections on its utility.