Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study assessed the parameter recovery accuracy of MML with EM algorithm and two MCMC methods, Gibbs and HMC, under the four-parameter unidimensional binary item response function. Data were simulated under the fully crossed design with three sample size levels (1000, 2500 and 5000 respondents) and two latent trait distributions (normal and negatively skewed). Results indicated that Gibbs and HMC offered nearly identical outcomes and produced lower total errors than MML across all conditions. Overall, MML was more extensively affected by θ skewness but had more appreciable accuracy improvement in conjunction with sample size increase than MCMC. Guidelines for measurement practitioners regarding estimation method selection, sample size requirement and consideration of the tenability of latent trait normality assumption are provided.