Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Working memory (WM) has been identified as a strong predictor of academic achievement (Seigel & Ryan, 1989; Swanson, Orosco, & Lussier, 2014). Research has indicated that children with low WM capacity have difficulty with cognitively demanding activities (Gathercole, Durling, Evans, Jeffcock, & Stone, 2008; Lamont & Alloway, 2006). Many of these students are misdiagnosed and identified by teachers as being inattentive, highly distractible and as having short attention spans (Gathercole, Alloway, Kirkwood, Elliott, Holmes, & Hilton, 2008). The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between teacher observations of students’ WM and students’ actual WM performance, while accounting for other factors such as language proficiency, reading and math achievement, and measures of inattention.