Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Cross-classified random effects modeling (CCREM) is a common approach to analyzing cross-classified data in education. However, when the focus of a study is on the regression coefficients at level-1 rather than on the random effects, ordinary least squares regression with cluster robust variance estimators (OLS-CRVE) or fixed effects regression with CRVE (FE-CRVE) could also be appropriate approaches. These alternatives have the advantage of working under weaker assumptions than CCREM. We conducted a Monte Carlo Simulation study to compare the performance of CCREM, OLS-CRVE, and FE-CRVE. Similar to CCREM, OLS-CRVE and FE-CRVE provided negligible bias on level-1 regression coefficients, but FE-CRVE performed better in precision and Type-I error rates than OLS-CRVE. We suggest FE-CRVE as a good alternative to CCREM.