Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Critical evaluation skills when using online information are considered key 21st century skills in research and education frameworks. Despite their importance, assessment of these skills in higher education is still an emerging field. We present a new developed theoretical-conceptual framework for Critical Online Reasoning (COR), situated in relation to prior approaches (e.g., 'web credibility', critical thinking'), along with an assessment framework and its preliminary validation. Based on our literature review and prior analyses, we classified COR into three facets: online information acquisition; critical information evaluation; reasoning based on evidence, argumentation, and synthesis. We modeled COR from a behavior, content, process, and development perspective, specifying scoring rubrics in an evidence-centered design. Validation results indicated the validity of the COR assessment.