Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study explores the dynamics between collective sense-making and collaboration quality among teams engaged in intergroup dialogues around politically charged topics in a computer-supported collaborative learning context. As the first step of our long-term efforts to design pedagogical tools for modelling difficult conversation in diverse teams, we examined how a low and a high-collaboration-quality team (defined by a pre-existing collaboration rubric) made collective sense of the discussion topics. For that, we conducted a microanalysis of discussions to identify intergroup communication patterns (engaging self, appreciating differences, critical reflection and alliance building; Nagda, 2006) among different collaborative process-quality teams. Findings showed that while high and low-collaboration-quality teams each evinced these intergroup communication patterns, higher-collaborative team tended to have more sophisticated discussions.