Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Most researchers do not consider if the wording of survey items may impact the results. To investigate this problem, this study validated the instrument of the Core Self-Evaluations Scale and its wording effects, as well as its factor structure. A U.S. sample of higher education faculty members is utilized, and three different theoretical models are tested and compared. The results indicate that all three models have model fit problems. The findings indicate that the negatively-worded items impact the overall validity, potentially causing survey results to be misleading. To improve the psychometric properties of the CSES, the revised one-factor CSES with 8 items is developed. The revised measure could be utilized for evaluation of faculty and researching their self-evaluations.