Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse Sessions by Descriptor
Browse Papers by Descriptor
Browse Sessions by Research Method
Browse Papers by Research Method
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
STEM fields are persistently stereotyped as affording agency-based goals and ill-suited for those who value communion (Diekman & Steinberg, 2013). By adulthood, tendencies toward agency versus communion fall along gendered lines, with men tending to report valuing agency more (and communion less) than women do. Importantly, these gendered value sets reliably predict men and women’s gravitation toward careers they perceive as in line with their identity (Schmader & Sedikides, 2018). Understanding the childhood emergence of gender differences in communal and agentic values may therefore inform our understanding of widespread gender segregation in the workplace (Cortes & Pan, 2018).
In this talk, we discuss evidence from three studies that early gender differences in values are meaningful and guide children’s aspirations for adulthood. In addition, we present novel findings that children’s internalization of values are linked to gender stereotypes. This cycle of stereotyping and internalization may then trap boys within career trajectories perceived as affording more agentic values (such as STEM) and girls within paths ascribed more communal values (such as healthcare, early education, and domestic paths; HEED).