Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This mixed methods study explored affective learning outcomes of elementary preservice teachers (PST) in a science methods course incorporating explicit instruction on drawing to reason. Drawing instruction was guided by Quillin and Thomas’ (2015) framework with instruction dimensions addressing affect, visual literacy, and model-based reasoning. Primary data included a semantic differential attitude (SDA) survey, science teaching self-efficacy belief (STEB) survey, and semi-structured interviews. At the end of the course, PSTs reported more positive perceptions of drawing, particularly the value of drawing for supporting student thinking, and higher STEB related to their explicit drawing instruction. This study has implications for expanding PSTs’ science teaching knowledge of instructional strategies such as drawing for supporting quality science learning in the elementary classroom.