Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Using a comparative case study methodology, we examine how two distinct cultures experience distance mentoring programs, both with the goal of increasing the STEM identity of underserved student populations. Using a variety of data points, including focus group interviews, email communication, and analysis of artifacts and quantitative data, we describe how mentors and mentees experience a distance mentoring program utilizing the eSTEM mentoring protocol. In addition, we provide descriptions of each of the ementoring programs, the curriculums guiding participant experiences, and describe the commonalities and differences among the two programs. We will conclude with a discussion on the implications for STEM-based mentoring and provide insights for the STEM field as it relates to recruiting and retaining underserved populations.
Cameron DeLeon Denson, North Carolina State University
Gary William Wright, III, University of Missouri
Teomara Rutherford, University of Delaware
Kiy Benton, North Carolina State University
Niloufar Bayati, North Carolina State University
Cigdem Meral, North Carolina State University
Tangie Fleming, North Carolina State University