Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study took the traditional framework of autonomy supportive instruction (ASI) from self-determination theory (SDT) and explored a race-reimaged (RR) extension using culturally relevant and responsive education (CRRE) as a sociocultural lens. Research questions involved (1) the extent to which SDT-ASI and RR-ASI practices were distinct, and (2) whether each RR-ASI practice explained variability in students’ autonomy, emotional engagement, and instructor trust. We developed a new RR-ASI scale. Undergraduate students of color (N = 409) answered questions about their motivation experiences and their teachers’ instructional style. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that two-factor models between RR-ASI and SDT-ASI fit the data best; correlations were medium-to-large. Structural equation modeling showed that RR-ASI practices were robust predictors of students’ outcomes beyond SDT-ASI.