Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In most discussions of effective feedback to students, grades are portrayed as a cruel and malicious villain. Some researchers suggest that grades stifle creativity, foster fear of failure, and weakened students’ interest (Lipnevich & Smith, 2008). Others contend that grades diminish students’ affect, especially their emotional and behavioral engagement in learning (Poorthuis, et.al., 2015). This has led some practitioners to believe that students’ affective characteristics and classroom learning conditions could be significantly improved simply by eliminating grades and “going gradeless” (Barnes, 2018; Burns & Frangiosa, 2021; Kohn, 1994, 1999; Spencer, 2017).
Close inspection of this research reveals, however, that findings are far more nuanced than most researchers or practitioners have interpreted them to be. The impact of grades on students varies depending on not only the nature, purpose, and meaning of the grades, but also on a multitude of contextual conditions related to characteristics of the students, the assessment, and learning conditions. For example, students’ reactions to grades are known to differ depending on whether the grades are criterion-referenced and task-focused versus norm-referenced and ego-focused (Guskey, 2019). Students’ perceptions of grades as well as their follow-up actions to grades also vary depending on the specific grade they receive (Link & Guskey, 2019).
This paper describes the potential and demonstrated influence of these complicating qualities, aspects, and distinctions on students’ interpretations of grades as a means of feedback. Research results are discussed in terms of these factors, common misinterpretations of research results that ignore these confounding variables are presented, and recommendations are offered for better practice.