Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Few studies have compared collaborative concept mapping (CCM) with other rigorous collaborative strategies, and fewer CCM studies have reported intentional collaboration between group members. This study uses a 2×2 factorial design in which collaborative activity (concept mapping vs. summary writing) was crossed with resource distribution (interdependence vs. independence). Participants were 428 undergraduates who were assigned to dyads. The 214 dyads were then randomly assigned to one of four conditions. The dependent measures were immediate retention and transfer, and mental effort. Results indicated a significant main effect for resource distribution for recall. However, no other significant effects were obtained indicating that the conditions yielded comparable learning outcomes. Theoretical, empirical, and practical implications of the results will be discussed at the conference.