Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Full Panel
The Supreme Court in the last few years surprisingly revived racial gerrymandering claims begun in the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Shaw v. Reno. It also will have the opportunity in the next few years to reconsider whether to start policing redistricting plans as partisan gerrymanders. As the new round of redistricting approaches and as the Supreme Court personnel begins to change, what are the contours of the judicial review of line drawing. Do racial and partisan gerrymandering claims present manageable standards? Is judicial intervention warranted and likely to lead to improved outcomes along accepted metrics?
A Reasonable Bias Method For Redistricting: A New Tool for an Old Problem - Bruce E. Cain, Stanford University; Wendy K. Tam Cho, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Racial Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court - Keith Gaddie, The University of Oklahoma #FrackOn
Race or Party, Party as Race, or Party All the Time - Richard L. Hasen, UC Irvine School of Law
The Sources and Magnitude of Partisan Bias in U.S. Federal Elections - Eric McGhee, Public Policy Institute of California; Nicholas Stephanopoulos, University of Chicago