Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite a wealth of research into party system stability, its nature and democratic role has remained contested. This article presents new insights into this question using a unique and extensive data set on party system stability measured in the governmental arena – closure. We contrast governmental closure, operationalized using the percentage of minister-changes, to indicators of stability pertaining to the parliamentary (fragmentation) and electoral (volatility) arenas. Our results from multiple methods show that systemic closure is positively related to the duration of democracy while the other measures are not. However, the stability of party relations in government is found to undermine – rather than support – certain aspects of democracy, particularly the deliberative and egalitarian dimensions
Fernando Casal Bertoa, University of Nottingham
Zsolt Enyedi, Central European University
Martin Mölder