Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Scholars typically examine state bureaucratic agencies from the perspective of the legislature or governor, without evaluating intergovernmental relations from the standpoint of the agencies themselves. Thus, we have a limited understanding of the institutional features that provide state administrators with an incentive to respond to legislative or gubernatorial preferences. Taking a different approach, we rely on a new survey of state administrators from five comparable agencies in all 50 states to assess how state administrators view their political principals and how institutional variation influences the democratic accountability of unelected bureaucrats. We find that administrators’ perceptions of responsiveness vary with the institutional organization of the legislature and executive branch. Our analysis has important implications for our understanding of political control of the bureaucracy and of the complexity of intergovernmental relations at the state level.