Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Roundtable
The definitional distinctions drawn between democracy and autocracy often belie significant
ambiguities within these categories. Despite the absence of formal institutions of democracy, a
wealth of research has revealed the presence of significant deliberative and contentious politics
within autocratic systems. In some cases electoral and representative mechanisms are
incorporated into the logic of autocratic governance. In others the ambiguity is at the level of
democratic practices and subjectivities. Similarly, formally democratic systems may contain
within them significant autocratic practices, institutions, and “personalities”. Are these simply
examples of hybridization? If not, can we theorize such ambiguities as a stable feature of
regimes? And given that these features may be adapted to different regimes contexts, how can
we distinguish the democratic vs. autocratic manifestations of such practices and institutions
Robyn Marasco CUNY, Hunter College
Dan Slater University of Michigan
Cihan Tugal UC Berkeley
Lisa Wedeen University of Chicago