Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Roundtable
How do we make sense of exclusion in the context of democratic politics? A contradiction? An
ambiguity? A necessity? While most would agree that exclusion poses one of the most serious
challenges to democratic legitimacy and stability, exclusionary delineations have also
contributed to maintaining a coherent sense of the self to be invoked for self-government. This
poses problems for both democratic theory and for the empirical study of democracy. What
modes of exclusion can democracy tolerate and what is the normative basis for making such
distinctions? How do we account for the fact that citizenship, a benchmark for democratic
inclusion, is not a stable category? And how might we engage with scholarship on identity and
belonging to better understand the dynamics of exclusion within the broader landscape of
democratic politics?
Amel F. Ahmed University of Massachusetts, Amherst
David Alexander Bateman Cornell University
Danielle P. Clealand University of Texas at Austin
Amaney Jamal Princeton University
Joseph E. Lowndes University of Oregon