Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Even the most authoritarian governments allow some citizens to leave. How do they decide who exits and who stays? In this paper, we outline the trade-offs that autocrats face in managing emigration. On the plus side, autocrats can rid their states of potential challengers and opposition supporters. There may also be economic benefits due to expropriation of emigrants' property, reduction in social welfare benefits, skills upgrading, remittances, and even payment by democratic governments for the release of some citizens. On the negative side, emigrants may represent a loss of human capital, signal the level of opposition to the wider world, and spread norms of democracy back to their home countries. We propose to examine how autocrats balance these trade-offs using Stasi archival data from the German Democratic Republic under Communist rule.
Julian Michel, UCLA
Michael K. Miller, George Washington University
Margaret E. Peters, University of California, Los Angeles