Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Researchers have linked a variety of emotions including anger, hatred, fear, and humiliation to inter-group conflict attitudes. National humiliation has particularly come under scrutiny because of its influence on China's and Russia's foreign policies. How do emotions spread socially to become politically relevant? Do emotional expressions of humiliation cause advocacy of hostile foreign policy positions and shape foreign policy debates? To answer these questions, I use supervised machine learning to measure the prevalence of narratives of national humiliation as well as the foreign policy positions taken in a large (more than 1.6 billion posts), representative data set of Chinese social media posts. I find that national humiliation spreads through emotional contagion both when group members express national humiliation and when they express support for policies associated with national humiliation. I further find that Weibo posts invoking narratives of national humiliation are more likely to support using military force, maintaining disputed territorial claims, and raising trade barriers.