Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Climate justice has become a significant research area in political theory, with a growing literature developing equitable principles for distributing the mitigation, adaptation, and compensation burdens of climate change. However, a growing discourse within both the labor and environmental movements frames climate justice less around ideal end-states but in terms of the means by which the necessary transition to carbon-free societies and economies should occur. This “just transition” discourse, which argues for bridging economic and ecological justice through decarbonization efforts that empower workers and vulnerable communities while providing social protection and compensation for displaced workers, provides a necessary corrective and valuable supplement to theories of climate justice. Through a discourse analysis and theoretical reconstruction of the just transition discourse, as articulated by actors and activists in the labor and climate justice movements, this paper seeks to both provide analytic clarity for the meaning of justice in this discourse while complicating and reorienting existing debates over climate justice. More specifically, integrating the idea of a just transition into climate justice theory advances climate justice theory in three ways. First, it broadens the scope of climate justice theory beyond distributive concerns to include precognitive and procedural justice. Second, it moves from a static to a dynamic conception of justice, by attending to the specific political, policy, and industrial processes of decarbonization. Third, it foregrounds politics over ideal theory, by emphasizing not only that achieving climate justice requires political mobilization and negotiating between diverse coalitions, but also that political action inevitably generates remainders and dislocations that demand their own just response. In addition to contributing to the development of non-ideal climate justice theory, this paper also accentuates the implications climate change raises for democratic theory, both in terms what effects climate change will have on democratic publics and citizenries as well as the potential for democratic mobilization around climate justice.