Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
What impact does personalism, or presidential dominance of a weakly organized ruling party, have on the level of democracy? This paper argues that presidents who dominate their own parties are more likely to seek to concentrate power, undermine horizontal accountability, and trample the rule of law than presidents who preside over a party that has an independent leadership and an institutionalized bureaucracy. Independent party leaders, we suggest, will often seek to curb the excesses of the president in order to protect their own political prospects. We explore these hypotheses through a quantitative analysis of the determinants of the level of democracy in 18 Latin American countries from 1980-2015. We find that personalism has a consistently negative impact on the level of democracy in Latin America.