Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
I model crisis bargaining as a war of attrition where both states simultaneously make offers. The war of attrition ends either when one of the states chooses to accept an offer or chooses to terminate negotiations and utilize an outside option, escalating the crisis to war. I show that all types issue a unique sequence of offers, giving rise to a dual screening process. More resolved states with better outside options have less to gain from a concession and so choose to escalate earlier. By contrast, unresolved states with a worse outside option concede earlier so as to avoid escalation from a potentially resolved rival. The model generates novel comparative statics regarding the length of delay in diplomatic negotiations.