Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Federal policies impacting the undocumented have become substantially more punitive
over the last decade. However, municipal governments have increasingly sought to counteract these policies with local accommodation measures. While the literature on the effects of policies that target specific racial and ethnic groups is well developed, there is no consistent theory regarding the interaction between federal and local
policies on targeted populations. I argue that as municipal governments increasingly
allocate resources and political protections for undocumented immigrant populations,
federal immigration enforcement activities also increase. To test this theory, I utilize
Williamson’s 2016 survey of municipal governments (MRIS16) alongside enforcement
data on Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) foreign-born removals supplemented
with demographic data provided by the American Communities Survey (ACS). I find mixed support for my theory. Municipal governments with increased immigrant accommodations do experience increased federal deportations in the area, but the relationship is dependent on local contextual factors and enforcement type.