Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: In-Person Full Paper Panel
The rising electoral success of politicians and parties campaigning on anti-globalization platforms, and the increasing politicization of various forms of international economic integration over the last decade, have prompted the development of a rich literature on the backlash against globalization. This literature has explored in-depth various determinants of the backlash, including both economic and cultural explanations. However, it also raises important new questions: how does anti-globalization rhetoric and discourse affect individuals’ attitudes and support for democratic norms? How do other norms, such as traditional gender roles or opposition to right-wing extremism, shape views on globalization? What role do strategic actors play in the backlash against globalization?
Our panel explores these questions in the context of a number of advanced democracies in North America and Western Europe. In the first paper, Andrew Kerner and Jane Sumner explore the relationship between gender norms and support for globalization. They argue that attitudes towards globalization are shaped by the fact that voters perceive economic integration as a threat to jobs that are traditionally coded as “male” in the United States. In the second paper, Sara Goodman studies the effect of invoking immigration as a threat to norms related to democratic citizenship in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. She finds that immigration threats are filtered through political cleavages in polarized settings.
Similarly focusing on the effects of political rhetoric on individual attitudes, Nina Obermeier analyzes the relationship between growing extremism among right-wing populist parties and public opinion towards different forms of international economic integration in Western Europe in the third paper. Finally, Aycan Katitas explores the effect of anti-globalization priming by political elites on public opinion towards free trade and immigration in the United States, using a large-scale survey experiment to test how anti-trade and ethnonationalist ads affect political attitudes. Together, these papers point to new areas of research within scholarship on the backlash against globalization and deepen our understanding of this increasingly important topic.
Gender Roles and Threat Perception Due to Globalization - Andrew Kerner, Michigan State University; Jane Lawrence Sumner, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Right-Wing Populism and Support for International Economic Integration in Europe - Nina Obermeier, Cornell University
Economic Shocks, Political Cues, and the Backlash Against Globalization - Aycan Katitas, Princeton University
The China Paradox: What Trade Rules for a (Developing) Economic Powerhouse? (Pre-Recorded) - Kristen Hopewell, University of British Columbia
Mass Public Opinions Towards Trade Balances: Mercantilism 2.0 (Pre-Recorded) - Tanja Schweinberger, University of Geneva