Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: In-Person Created Panel
This panel convenes four papers to stage a comparative analysis of political resistance. Gabriel Vergara reconstructs Gramsci’s notion of ‘the modern prince’ to think through communicative forms of coercion, using Fidel Castro and his revolutionary struggle as a case study for Gramsci’s theory. Gonzalo Bustamante Kuschel revisits the liberalism/republicanism debate, turning back to the Calvinist Monarchomacs as a resource for theorizing republican modes of resisting tyrannical government. Mark Jendrysik asks what rebellion and resistance mean in a free society, turning back to the case of Shays’ Rebellion and its reception in American history. Lastly, Aspen Elizabeth Brinton distills four concepts of dissidence from the work of Czech phenomenologist Jan Patočka as a springboard for imagining dissident practices for the future.
Jan Patočka and Political Theory: Four Concepts of Dissidence (Pre-Recorded) - Aspen Elizabeth Brinton, Virginia Commonwealth University
Shays’ Rebellion as a Clash of Republican Visions - Mark Stephen Jendrysik, University of North Dakota
The Right of Resistance: from the Monarchomacs to Modern Republicanism - Gonzalo Bustamante Kuschel
The Modern Prince: Consent, Coercion, and Fidel Castro - Gabriel Vergara, University of Massachusetts Amherst