Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Virtual Roundtable
There is ambiguity on the role/place of formal modeling in the use of the scientific method and in the general practice of political science. Lack of clarity on these issues has undermined the expansion of formal modeling in the discipline. If modeling is useful or even necessary and is to be preserved as a part of the general epistemological schema, a conversation towards shared understanding needs to take place.
How important is it to maintain mathematical logicality between premises and conjectures in a theory?
Do we start with evidence when modeling, even if this evidence is in a form of a single datum? Are we always both inductive and deductive?
Are conjectures about the unobservable, and more generally, claims that are non-falsifiable in a strict sense a part of the scientific inquiry?