Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Do U.S. casualties in trip-wire forces increase public support for foreign military intervention? Scholars and policymakers believe that placing a small force in harm's way to ensure that an attacker will kill U.S. soldiers, public outrage will ensure mass support for intervention. Despite the importance of this trip wire logic in the theory and practice of deterrence, especially for generating credible commitments in military alliances, there is little evidence whether it works as expected. Using a survey experiment, we assess whether U.S. casualties increase support for foreign intervention. We also examine potential limitations of the trip wire effect and consider how reputation, honor, revenge, nationalism and national interests connect U.S. casualties and support for intervention.