Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The traditional political economy view of trade is that governments choose tariffs to maximize a weighted sum of producer and consumer surplus, with relative weights capturing the influence of producer lobbies. Such weights determine both the level of tariffs and their relationship with comparative advantage. To partially identify these weights, we use data on Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and the associated changes in tariffs on agricultural imports. We exploit plausibly exogenous variation in comparative advantage as induced by rainfalls during the growing season within and across countries in the years prior to the final signature to identify its impact on the extent of tariff reduction across crops. We find that when comparative advantage in producing a given crop increases governments decrease tariffs on imports of that crop to a smaller extent. These results suggest that during trade negotiations governments attach a high weight on producers relative to consumers in their objective function.