Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Social media is used by nearly three-fourths of all Americans, and so-called “viral” videos are seen by millions across these platforms. Very little scholarly work explores how these viral videos can affect political knowledge, particularly through incidental learning by those otherwise not exposed to political information. We address this lacuna with an experiment embedded in a nationally representative survey of 400 Americans. We test the effect of one particular video from the TikTok platform on respondents’ basic understanding of the legal doctrine qualified immunity, relative to a more traditional online information source and a pure control. We find that, at baseline, qualified immunity is not well understood by the American public, and that the Tik Tok video increases understanding of the legal doctrine significantly and to a similar degree as the traditional online information source. Furthermore, this effect is most pronounced in low education individuals. These findings provide preliminary evidence that incidental information within viral videos on social media may help to close the knowledge gap between individuals of low and high education.