Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Little attention has paid to how countries choose specific sanctions measures, especially compared with the amount of research on their effectiveness and imposition. In this article, I consider import restrictions as a type of distributive policy that creates winners and losers. Based on Mayer-Hecksher-Ohlin model (1984), I argue that capital-abundant sender country is more likely to impose import restrictions to represent a demand for policies that increasingly favor the labor sector when the sender country has the majoritarian systems that encourage politicians to appeal to the median voter who favors import restrictions. I test this theoretical hypothesis using the Threat and Imposition of Sanctions (TIES) data. The empirical results show that capital abundant countries are positively associated with use of import restrictions as a sanction measure when the sender countries have majoritarian rules.