Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
By organizing voter registration drives, collecting donations, and facilitating political discussion, churches can play multiple roles in the functioning of democracy. Why do some churches facilitate deliberation and political action while others do not? What are the political consequences? This article links this variation to the distinction between specialist churches that focus on specific ethnic, cultural, or territorial populations, and diverse churches that serve a range of populations. I suggest that specialist churches develop understandings of “how we do things here” (or “styles”) that facilitate deliberation and action, while diverse churches develop styles that constrain these involvements. These outcomes are troubling because they suggest that churches that could facilitate deliberation and action across difference are likely to lose sight of this potential. I build these arguments inductively with data from ethnographic and interview-based fieldwork in the United States. Methodologically, I seek to demonstrate the synergies between positivist and interpretive methodologies.