Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Israel's political system is almost a synonym for electoral fragmentation and multilevel political instability. Yet, one position within Israel is quite stable: the Prime Minister's position. Based on research on leadership patterns in parliamentary systems, I show that Israeli Prime Ministers use electoral fragmentation to maneuver between institutional settings: cabinets, governments, parliaments, and their parties. The variance between levels of institutional instability accords with four leadership patterns of Prime Ministers: as part of the party’s leadership collective, party-based, Prime Ministerialized or Presidentialized. These leadership patterns depend on the party system’s structure, Prime-Ministers' popularity and the interaction with the party they lead. These factors affect Prime-Ministers' ability to use Israel's electoral fragmentation to survive in office. Consequently, they reflect different modes of operation for Prime-Ministers and yield different patterns of political instability in Israel.