Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Public-sector unions are the hegemonic contemporary labor actor in terms of militancy and mobilization in both advanced and emergent economies. However, Political Science lacks a unified theoretical approach to study mobilization by state unions. The study of public-sector union politics has undergone divergent paths in the last fifty years, largely separated by regional (US vs. Europe) and disciplinary (American Politics vs. Comparative Politics) divides. This study proposes a stylized theory that combines (and modifies) aspects of both traditions. We argue that public-sector labor mobilization is essentially driven by the legal status of wage bargaining rights at the national and (in federal countries) subnational levels, by the likelihood of a political-exchange between government and labor, and by the state fiscal condition. Argentina between 2003 and 2019 provides an ideal laboratory to test our theoretical argument through a multilevel, mixed methods strategy, which includes comparative, statistical and case-study assessments.
Sebastian Etchemendy, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
German Jorge Lodola, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella