Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Post-coup governments are inherently precarious: sanctions from trading partners who supported the old regime, uncertainty about future policies, and disruptions to day-to-day life all undermine growth and prosperity, which a new regime relies on to buy loyalty from troops and gain legitimacy from citizens. How do post-coup regimes manage to survive?
We examine protected forest areas before and after the 2021 military coup in Myanmar, finding that they experience a considerable differential increase in violence in the post-coup era. We also examine patterns of deforestation during the pre-democracy, democracy and post-coup era. We find evidence that high-value forestry zones where teak wood is located are at the center of post-coup violence. We also find that there is a complex relationship between democratization, backsliding and environmental degradation: deforestation appears to be associated with economic growth during the democratic period, although high-value deforestation also increases post-coup as the regime seeks revenue.